My name is Stephen Clark. I practiced law for more than 35 years. After stints with a Wall Street law firm, a Fortune 50 company, and a national civil rights organization, I focused the last 20 years of my practice on helping individuals in family law cases. I handled hundreds of family law cases through all the various stages of litigation, including numerous trials, but most of the cases were resolved through mediation - some sooner, some later. I know from first-hand experience the difficult challenges family law matters present. I have the knowledge and expertise to help you achieve a resolution. I will hear your voice, with compassion, and do my best to help you reach resolution by agreement through principled negotiation.
Mediation allows you to resolve your family law matter without the stress, expense and uncertainty of litigation. The core mediation principle of self-determination guarantees that, if you participate in good faith, engage in principled negotiation, and reach resolution by agreement, you will have not only a clear voice but also a strong hand
in the outcome.
Here are answers to some common questions about mediation. Please reach us at stephen@sunrise-mediation.com if you have other questions.
Mediation allows you to have a not only a voice, but also a hand, in crafting a resolution of your family law matter. If you go to court, your ability to be heard will be subject to the constraints and limitations of the judicial process, through "direct examination" by your counsel and cross-examination by opposing counsel, both subject to strict rules of evidence. The resolution of your case will then be completely up to the judicial officer based on the information gleaned through that process. In my experience, people who go through the litigation process end up wondering whether their voice was well and truly heard, and the litigation process tends to create "winners" and "losers." Every judge I have ever known strongly encourages parties to resolve their cases by agreement, because that increases the chances that both sides can live with the result, even if neither side got everything they might have wanted.
No. As a lawyer I handled many cases for clients who wanted to work things out, but just needed a context where they could be heard and work toward a resolution by agreement without fighting about everything, as sometimes can happen in the litigation context. Whether you've not commenced litigation, whether you are in the early stages of litigation, or whether you're exhausted from litigation that has not achieved resolution, I can help you reach resolution by agreement through mediation.
It's simple. Just click on the "Book" button in the Easy Online Appointment Scheduling immediately below, choosing either a full or half day, and either virtual or in person. You will be able to see the dates I have available for mediation - they appear in a circle (if the date is not circled, that means the date is already booked) - and then provide contact information. You and I will both then get notice that a mediation has been scheduled, and I will follow up to obtain contact information about the parties and/or their counsel so that I can provide a copy of my Mediation Agreement. This is a simple, two-page document that explains the nature of mediation, my role, my compensation and a bit about the process. That's all it takes to initiate the process.
At minimum, I would like to know, in advance, each party's sense of what the issues are, and each party's position on those issues. Ideally, however - since the model I follow is centered not on "positional bargaining," but rather on "principled negotiation" - it's also helpful for me to understand the interests underlying the reasons. For example, issues involving minor children depend on identifying and implementing agreements that are in the children's best interests, so while one parent might say "I want sole custody" that is a statement of position; open discussion of what custodial and parent-time arrangements are in the best interests of the children facilitates principled negotiation toward resolution by agreement. Similarly, "I don't want to pay alimony" is a statement of position; open discussion of each party's reasonable needs in light of the marital lifestyle and each party's ability to maintain that lifestyle after divorce facilitates principled negotiation. Again, speaking ideally, I would receive this kind of information in advance. But I am a quick study, so if you prefer to help educate me at the outset of our mediation session, I can do that, too, through open dialogue. I want to make this as stress-free for you as I can.
The typical mediation session begins with my briefly meeting with each party and their counsel (if the parties have counsel) to talk about what to expect during our time together. This can be done jointly, or separately. After that, the typical mediation involves my going back and forth between separate breakout rooms conveying proposals and counter-proposals until it is clear that the parties either have been able to reach resolution by agreement, or are not quite ready to reach resolution by agreement. Either way, my hope is your participation in the process has helped you see the issues and potential outcomes more clearly, so that you can make good decisions going forward.
I started Resolution By Agreement with a simple idea: to give individuals not only a voice, but also a hand, in crafting the solution to their family-law matters. As a longtime litigator, I wanted to bring my considerable experience in the litigation context to bear in the very different context of mediation, where there is an opportunity to reach resolution by agreement. The standards that apply in the mediation context, which I promise to strive to meet, and which may be of interest to parties and counsel, are available here:
Utah Mediation Best Practice Guide - Updated 5/2022 (utcourts.gov) .
Each mediation is unique, and how it unfolds depends not only on the issues, but also on the personalities of the participants. In formal terms, recognized mediation styles include "facilitative" (where the mediator's main role is to facilitate agreement); "analytical" (where the mediator helps analyze the issues in light of governing legal authorities, always without providing legal advice); and"evaluative" (where the mediator shares his experience with how courts might approach the issues, again without giving legal advice or predicting outcomes). These styles are not mutually exclusive, and one or more may help the parties reach resolution by agreement. Regardless of the mediation style, however, the core principle of Resolution By Agreement is the self-determination of the parties, and the key to a successful mediation is to follow the model of "principled negotiation" described in the seminal mediation handbook, "Getting to Yes."
Open today | 09:00 am – 05:00 pm |
Resolution By Agreement, LLC
Copyright © 2023 Resolution By Agreement, llc - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.